The story of Job is interesting, because if you read it from the JW perspective, it is indeed horrendous.
However, that translation (many English translations) deal rather poorly with the subject matter and the exegesis of the JW is completely different than what most scholars will say.
First of all, Job is shown to be a pious man, who by sheer luck hasn’t had to deal with the hardships of life, when bad things happen to him, he calls God to a tribunal of sorts. Off course JW portray this as Job being the bad person, but in Jewish tradition, it is the opposite, it is normal for this sort of reaction and the reaction of his friends are also what basically someone (the friends) with no experience of hardship would say.
The rest of the book is basically God explaining that there are 2 aspects to nature, the monsters he created and the beautiful things go to the duality of nature. The leviathan, behemoth, unicorns etc are true monsters in the historical context, not what JW’s declare it to be some kind of dinosaur or wild beast, no the original text in the context of the culture they are true mythological monsters that represent chaos and evil and God created both. In the end, Job learns that these things aren’t his nor God’s fault, they happen but if you hang on and get through, good things may/will happen again to you. God doesn’t get “angry” in the JW translation but rather seems to not understand that Job can be so naive, so he returns and provides wisdom that nothing in the end can be blamed for the random things that happen in your life.
This goes to the mythology of Satan and God in Christianity vs Judaism and earlier religions, historically speaking, they are both aspects of nature up to about the Renaissance. Christianity (at least modern forms) try to make a separation between good and evil whereas Judaism and earlier religions make them more part of one needs the other.
I think bringing the JW view of morality to modern arguments is wrong, because the exegesis of scripture by JWs is what fits them (and not unusual for 1800s pop religions), rather than the Jewish or Catholic view of what fits historical scripture and culture.
In those context, the question of good and evil goes away, God has instituted nature as it is and we are the ones with the ultimate responsibility for our destiny, are we going to lean into our base desires or trying to strive to something better, either way is going to be problematic, the holy things are only there as a distillation of the best we can be.
